This is an old revision of the document!
The Government Model
- the basic solution
- opt-in taxes, anybody can propose a tax.
- Something like kickstarter
- if it gets 40% of the vote, the budget proposed at this level gets accepted and only those that vote for it pay for it
- if it gets 60% of the vote, the budget proposed at this level gets accepted and only those that vote for it pay for it
- if it gets 80% of the vote, the budget proposed at this level gets accepted and everyone pays for it
- All tax proposals must submit a Proposal and an 80% budget and a 120 character statement highlighting what it is.
- 40% budget proposals do not need to be submitted but the tax will not qualify for a 40% goal
- 60% budget proposals do not need to be submitted but the tax will not qualify for a 60% goal
- All tax proposals must select at what government level it exists at, Federal, State, City, County, or District.
- and select specifically what State, City, County, or District it is effecting
- you sue or class action suit (which can be a tax proposal), both criminal and civil. The punishment is the only thing that denotes which. No District attorneys.
- Lawyers are raffle appointed.
- Judges are voted in and if the defendant requests another judge, it gets granted.
- defendant choses if it's a jury or judge ruling
- the president is elected and decides international affairs
- congress only decides on international affairs.
- Federal level government only determines foreign affairs. If one state is requesting other states assist. It proposes a tax in other states.
- police react to citizen complaints. people complain that too much speeding. people complain crime is occurring. etc.
- everything is reactive not proactive.
not as good solution
- Identify a problem, Representatives bring problems to the government, they do NOT bring solutions.
- obviously they can present solutions to the research group.
- But the research group needs to work through the process of certifying a solution.
- the group Researches solutions to solve the problem
- if a solution exists ask businesses to implement or pay a fine
- This solution can NOT be privately owned.
- If other solutions exist they have to be required equally
- If the majority of the community pushes back, understand the issue and work to find a solution, by going back to step one, until that community will accept the solution.
- If a solution does not exist, create an X-Prize to encourage society to create a solution.
- if there are alternatives to the market, diesel, electric, gasoline. Propose switching to the alternative
- this cannot be a requirement. in the example of diesel, electric, gasoline. The benefit is diesel at 50% efficiency, electric at 41% efficiency, and gasoline at 30% efficiency. So which is the right solution? Let the market decide
- this goes back to “if the community pushes back” find other solutions
- the other reason it cannot be a requirement is that it would cause the business to no longer exist creating a void in the market. Letting the market decide creates a timeline for the market to transition. Tesla has been at it since the early 2000s and in 2022, it still doesn't have market dominance. Granted the governments, EU, is forcing car companies to switch. But the community is still pushing back. Because they are not as good as gas. So the EU is violating the rule, “you can't enforce it if the community pushes back”
